On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:55:36PM -0000, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx scripsit:
[snip]
> I haven't completely understood it but the third point sounds like you
> need fn:transform on dynamically constructed or retrieved code. I know
> you ruled that out in your initial post but I am not sure there is a
> simpler way.

I am not at all sure I completely understand the problem either!

"There isn't a simpler way" is useful because that tells me I need to
approach this another way.

Thank you!

-- 
Graydon Saunders  | graydonish@xxxxxxxxx
^fs oferiode, pisses swa mfg.
-- Deor  ("That passed, so may this.")