On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:08 AM Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Note that XSLT does not have, and has never had, loops in the
> procedural sense (although there's a saxon:while extension which is
> close).
>
> For example, the XSLT processor is free to evalueate for-each in any
> order, as long as the result ends up sorted appropriately.
>
> But it's a common impression that many people have, that for-each is a
> loop. The impression can lead to problems in corner cases.
>
Thanks for insightful points.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
|