>>The question doesn't make sense. You cannot >>compare performance of
programming >>languages or specifications.
The question makes sense if you read the original question ..
Which says when calling within java.

On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Any inputs in how the memory is handled in xpath vs jaxb ? For a xml of a
> decent size (that a DOM can handle ) is there any preference of one or the
> other in terms of performance ?
> Than
>
>
The question doesn't make sense. You cannot compare performance of
programming languages or specifications. You might do this for
*implementations,* and even then it typically varies, depending on the use
case. And xpath and jaxb don't have the same use case domains.

-W


XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
EasyUnsubscribe <-list/620062> (by
email <>)