> I think I have it:
>
> preceding::fig[.!="" and ancestor::grp = current()/ancestor::grp][1]
It's a bad mistake to use "=" to test whether two nodes are the same node (so
to speak). You're actually comparing the string values of the nodes, which is
a very expensive operation for nodes that have large subtrees, and if you're
unlucky it could give you a false positive. In 2.0, use the "is" operator. In
1.0, compare node identity using generate-id(), or count($X|$Y)=1.
The other problem with this expression is that if there isn't a preceding
figure within the subtree, it could take a long search to find out (back to
the start of the document).
It might be worth noting that preceding::x gives the same nodes as
ancestor-or-self::*/preceding-sibling::*/descendant-or-self::x. Using this
equivalence, you can stop the search earlier by qualifying the first step:
ancestor-or-self::*[ancestor::grp]/preceding-sibling::*/descendant-or-self::x
Michael Kay
Saxonica
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Quatro rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 3:44 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: preceding with the same ancestor as self
>
> Hi,
>
> When I am at a <fig> with no text, I want to find the previous <fig> that
> has text, but only within the same ancestor group.
>
> I am using this:
>
> preceding::fig[.!=""][1]
>
> This works for all of the empty <fig> elements in the first <grp>, but in
> the second <grp>, it incorrectly picks up the <fig> with the 4 value from
> the previous <grp>. How can I restrict the preceding axis so a found node
> will have the same ancestor as the context node? Thanks.
>
> Rick
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <doc>
> <grp>
> <fig/>
> <fig>1</fig>
> <fig>2</fig>
> <fig/>
> <sub>
> <fig>3</fig>
> </sub>
> <fig/>
> <fig>4</fig>
> </grp>
> <grp>
> <fig/>
> <fig>1</fig>
> <fig>2</fig>
> <fig>3</fig>
> <sub>
> <fig/>
> </sub>
> <fig/>
> </grp>
> </doc>
|