Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the wh

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: Piotr Bański <bansp@xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:49:23 +0100

But nodes don't nest, subtrees do. Those subtrees have minimally a root node, and are sometimes identified with that root node, metonymically. But to speak of a node nested inside another... urgle. Sounds wrongish.

Same thing about containment, of course.

Best,

P.

On 14/01/14 22:20, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

I vote for "nested".

Sample usage:

	//x is a "crawling" expression - one that selects
	nodes which may nest inside one another.

/Roger

Current Thread

Re: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued)
- Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 21:21:11 -0000
  - Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 21:49:37 -0000 <=
    - Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:08:56 -0000
    - Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 22:23:59 -0000
- Costello, Roger L. - 15 Jan 2014 10:48:44 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 15 Jan 2014 11:17:10 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Does the count() function, Costello, Roger L.	Thread	Re: Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev
RE: Does the count() function, Costello, Roger L.	Date	Re: Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >