Subject: Re: To self or not to self
From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:25:10 -0500
|
> //figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][figure]
The default axis is "child::", so this should be the same as
//figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][child::figure]
But you said you want the <figure> that has an immediate preceeding
sibling. The path
//figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][self::figure]
picks up the preceding sibling itself, not the <figure> that has the
preceding sibling. Perhaps you want something like
//figure[preceding-sibling::*[1][self::figure]]
> I wanted to isolate the figure element that has a figure as an
> immediate preceding sibling.
>
> <section role="All_models">
> <title>All models</title>
> <figure role="Harness_multi-plug">
> <title>ECU harness multi-plug</title>
> <mediaobject>
> <imageobject>
> <imagedata fileref="78650"/>
> </imageobject>
> </mediaobject>
> </figure>
> <figure role="Circuit_diagram">
> <title>System circuit diagram</title>
> <mediaobject>
> <imageobject>
> <imagedata fileref="31544"/>
> </imageobject>
> </mediaobject>
> </figure>
> </section>
>
> I settled on //figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][figure] but it gave back
> nothing and would only work when I used the explicit form of the self
> axis.
>
> I settled on //figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][self::figure]
>
> However if I want the title element immediately preceding figure I
> don't need to use the explicit form. This works
>
> //figure/preceding-sibling::*[1][title]
>
> So what is going on in this particular case (because I don't
> understand the difference), and in general when is explicit self
> required.
|