[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
You seem to be asking three separate questions.
In the title of your post, you allude to the extent to which the technology is adopted and how this might change over time. But you don't really explain how the body of your post relates to this question, nor do you give any data about the level of adoption or how this is changing. Which is wise, because there is no hard data, and extrapolating from the morsels of data we have (such as google search trends) is probably very unreliable. Then you tell us an anecdote about (if I read it right) a company that is having trouble recruiting. Well, there could be a million reasons for that; I'm not sure what we are supposed to read into this story. Finally you ask for a list of XML applications. Well, you might collect some, though again, good information is notoriously hard to come by. Very few of the projects I have consulted to over the years have made anything public or visible about the fact that their systems are based very largely on XML. Different people will see what's happening from different perspectives and draw different conclusions; every one of them is seeing a tiny part of the total picture. From my perspective, what I see is that XML (and with it XSLT) is now a mature technology that is deeply embedded in the infrastructure, that is doing a very useful job, and that no longer has any great novelty or fashion appeal. Michael Kay Saxonica On 02/11/2011 19:54, Hank Ratzesberger wrote: Hi,
|

Cart



