On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Olivier Jeulin
<olivier.jeulin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 13/10/2010 19:50, Dimitre Novatchev a C)crit :
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Scott Trenda<Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx>
>> B wrote:
>>>
>>> New XSLT 2.1 feature? :)
>>
>>
>> Could be something as:
>>
>> B  B  B  keys(keyname as xs:string) as item()*
>>
>> and an additional overload:
>>
>> B  B  B  keys(keyname as xs:string, document as document-node()) as
item()*
>
> Yes, it looks fine. But keys are atomized, so shouldn't keys() return
> xs:anyType* instead of item()* ?


Did you mean xs:anyAtomicType*   ? Yes, this is precise.


--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play