[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
James Cummings wrote:
I'm trying to process some very flat XML which looks something like: Here is an XSLT 2.0 stylesheet that should do: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:mf="http://example.com/mf" exclude-result-prefixes="xs mf" version="2.0"> <xsl:output indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="body">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:sequence select="mf:group(*, 1, 0)"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template><xsl:function name="mf:group" as="node()*"> <xsl:param name="elements" as="element()*"/> <xsl:param name="level" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:param name="last-level" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:for-each-group select="$elements" group-starting-with="head[@level = $level]"> <xsl:variable name="head" as="element()?" select=".[self::head[@level = $level]]"/> <xsl:variable name="tail" as="element()*" select="current-group() except $head"/> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="$head"> <xsl:sequence select="mf:nested-divs($head, $tail, $level, $level - $last-level)"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="$tail[self::head[@level]]"> <xsl:sequence select="mf:group($tail, $level + 1, $last-level)"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:copy-of select="$tail"/> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:for-each-group> </xsl:function> <xsl:function name="mf:nested-divs" as="element()*"> <xsl:param name="head" as="element()?"/> <xsl:param name="tail" as="element()*"/> <xsl:param name="level" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:param name="i" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="$i gt 0"> <div> <xsl:sequence select="mf:nested-divs($head, $tail, $level, $i - 1)"/> </div> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:copy-of select="$head"/> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="$tail[self::head[@level]]"> <xsl:sequence select="mf:group($tail, $level + 1, $level)"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:copy-of select="$tail"/> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:function> </xsl:stylesheet> It has become rather complicated with two functions due to the requirement to add missing levels. Your latest suggestion to first normalize the input by adding missing levels and then to group in a second pass might indeed be an approach leading to shorter and less complicated code. -- Martin Honnen http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
|

Cart



