Subject: Re: set union? xslt 2.0
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:47:12 +0100
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:14:14 +0100
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip/>
Thanks for the longer explanation David.
All now working.
Quotable quote?
"It's fairly natural to have implicit quantification since the basic
type in xpath is a set 9xpat 10 or sequence (xpath 2) rather than
singltons."
I'm sure I could work that out if my keyboard had anything
engraved on the keycaps.
-
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
|
Cart
