Subject: Re: FO checkbox from 2 inline ZapfDingbat characters
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:23:38 +0000
|
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:26:03 +0200
Jacobus Reyneke <jacobusreyneke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think what Karl means is that he wants to put one character on top
> of the other, ie a check mark onto a square, rather than between two
> characters. I don't know how this is done, but here are some
> alternatives:
Trust Unicode... or listen to Chris on the fop list.
Try U+2611, BALLOT BOX WITH CHECK, or U+2612, BALLOT BOX WITH X.
GIYF
> An SVG image may be a good way to go if you really need fancy drop
> shadow effects etc. I'm a novice with XSL-FO, but I have found SVG to
> be a good alternative for floating objects in XSL-FO.
>
> Dave, is there any reason one should avoid SVG or is it o.k. to mix
> and match it with XSL-FO?
No, I can only see SVG usage increasing in xsl-fo in the future.
It is so useful.
HTH
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
|