Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 08/03/2010 10:23, Wolfgang Laun wrote: tree in teh result. You can not have "half a node".
:-)
If you have a regexp that you can apply to your text to say you want to start a new group, then (in xslt 2) you can use <xsl:for-each-group with group-starting-with testing that regexp. positional grouping is a little more involved in xslt 1. As always, it's easier to give advice on a small running example. > or they may not be well formed etc. Not sure what that would mean, xslt always (excepting disable-output-escaping and character maps) produces well formed results. It may be that the input isn't groupable because of conflicting constraints, but that's a different issue. Of course it may be (if you setup supports it) you can just do what you ask in the subject line <xsl:value-of disable-output-encoding"><tag></xsl:value-of> ... <xsl:value-of disable-output-encoding"></tag></xsl:value-of> But using d-o-e is almost always the wrong thing to do, and if you have xpath predicates that can reliably decide to insert thise tags, you can use the same predicates for grouping and not need d-o-e. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
|
