By the way, I'm not against a 2.0 solution.  Is there one?

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:37 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25/02/2010 05:15, Karl Stubsjoen wrote:
>>
>> Looking for XSL 1.0 solution.
>
>
> oops sorry missed that. The one I posted was xslt 2.
> in that case you need an extension function giving access to an html parser.
>
> David
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs.
> ________________________________________________________________________