Subject: Re: extension functions returning temporary trees
From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:40:04 +0300
|
"hey Altova leave the kids alone" :)
2009/12/16 Brian Newman <brian.newman@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> B B B B Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:10:34 -0000
> B B B B To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> B B B B From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> B B B B Subject: RE: extension functions returning temporary trees
> B B B B Message-ID: <1D5F068BD1FC442F8BC67668EA070D35@Sealion>
>
> B B B B The way extension functions work is entirely a matter for the
processor, but I would be rather surprised if the call mechanism allowed you
to B return a string containing lexical XML, and implicitly parsed that XML
and turned it into a tree of nodes. That conversion needs to be done e B
explicitly by calling an XML parser, either from the C# before returning from
the extension, or from the XSLT code after returning.
>
> B B B B Regards,
>
> B B B B Michael Kay
> B B B B http://www.saxonica.com/
> B B B B http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
>
> Turns out that it's a known bug in the Altova engine with a pre-existing
trouble ticket.
> "29642 - extension function support for result tree fragments and node
sets"
> Extension functions can't return node-sets/temporary trees
> I guess I can stop banging me head against the wall - the wall will
certainly appreciate it.
|