Subject: Re: XPath (and other W3C drafts)
From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:01:37 -0600
|
On 12/16/09 9:57 AM, "Florent Georges" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eliot Kimber wrote:
>
>> At the risk of seeming dim or lazy or both, can someone
>> explain the implications of these new features?
>
> Using 'let', you can bind a variable directly in XPath. There
> is of course no impact on XQuery. In XSLT, that is sometimes
> convenient to be able to write a single XPath expression without
> requiring to split it into several expressions or to write a
> stylesheet function. And that's important too for other host
> languages.
>
> Using first-class function items, you can manipulate functions
> as items. For instance, you can pass a function as parameter to
> another function. Think for instance about a sorting function,
> taking a function item parameter to compare two items:
Got it--thanks!
I'm assuming that Saxon will or has already implemented these new
features...?
Cheers,
Eliot
--
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 610.631.6770
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com
| Current Thread |
|
Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 15:11:26 -0000
|
|