Subject: Re: returning nodes which have a specific child
From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:52:43 +0530
|
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael Sokolov<sokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> including the
> bizarre conceit that attribute *nodes* are not matched by the 'node()' test
> (perhaps some other name would have been more appropriate?).
I am not aware of the discussions, that went amongst the WG members,
when XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 was designed.
But I think,
Calling attributes as "nodes" is ok. As attributes are modeled similar
to other kinds of nodes. They have name, value, parent etc.
Attributes can be referred as @* while other kinds of nodes with
node() and so on.
I find this design ok :)
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
| Current Thread |
|---|
Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 13:06:43 -0000
- Mukul Gandhi - 3 Jul 2009 13:23:26 -0000 <=
|
|
Cart
