Subject: Re: AltovaXML and fragment identifier
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:37:54 GMT
|
I wrote
> , however a system is
> allowed to reject any URI at all and if it chooses to reject all uri
> with fragids passed to doc() or document() it can do that, but it should
> raise [err:FODC0005].
which is false. It's true for doc() (which was what I was reading) but
for document() the spec explictly says that the fragment identifier
should be stripped off and used after retrieval.
So
document('test2009031701.xml#f1')
is the same as
document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')
or
document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')
or an error, depending on various factors....
So, I don't thinl the system is correct if it raises an error for
test2009031701.xml#f1 but not for test2009031701.xml.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
|