> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
<cmsmcq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> In practice, I discover that Google can't tell me about any SGML
>> parser on the Web that says it can emit SAX events.  This
>> surprises me a bit: the thing I wanted most, in the first ten
>> years I used SGML, was something very much like XSLT.  Do all the
>> people currently using SGML find themselves so happy with their
>> existing tools that they never want to use XSLT?  Wow; better
>> tools than I remember having :)

Probably you should look at "SGML ESIS Event" instead of "SAX for SGML"
It means there might need so crafting around, but it could be done

Xmlizer