> It is advisable not to use XSLT 1.1 as this language version 
> never became a W3C standard.
> 
...
> 
> At this point of time, one should use XSLT 1.0 or XSLT 2.0 as 
> both these language versions are now W3C standards, and 
> widely supported in products.

Indeed. And the only difference as far as the stylesheet below is concerned
is that xsl:document in the 1.1 draft became xsl:result-document in 2.0.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

> 
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Grahn, Karl-Johan 
> <Karl-Johan.Grahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > in XSLT 1.1 using Saxon:
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet 
> > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> > version="1.1">
> >  <xsl:template match="/">
> >    <xsl:apply-templates/>
> >  </xsl:template>
> >
> >  <xsl:template match="cds">
> >    <xsl:document href="cds.xml">
> >      <xsl:copy-of select="."/>
> >    </xsl:document>
> >  </xsl:template>
> >
> >  <xsl:template match="artists">
> >    <xsl:document href="artists.xml">
> >      <xsl:copy-of select="."/>
> >    </xsl:document>
> >  </xsl:template>
> >
> > </xsl:stylesheet>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Karl-Johan Grahn
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi