I think it's slightly difficult (though not impossible) to process
with XSLT, a very mixed kind of content model with XSLT.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I really liked the way Wendell Piez put it a while ago on this list:
>
>  XSLT, especially XSLT 1.0, is at its best when the incoming data
>  is well designed. When it isn't, one has to call on more advanced
>  techniques such as processing text nodes explicitly. Of course,
>  XSLT also exerts a gravitational pull on XML semantics, such that
>  well-designed XML comes to be the XML that XSLT can handle without
>  fuss. -- Wendell Piez, 30.09.2008, XSL-List



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi