Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Thanks a lot for a nice explanation.

I explained my thinking, not the truth - sorry...

> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ronan Klyne <ronan.klyne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> X[@a='hi'][@b='hi..']
>> If X[@a='hi'] matches a node, then that node will become the context
>> node when evaluating [@b='hi..']
> 
> I was thinking today, that for evaluating [@a='hi'] and [@b='hi..']
> context node would be same (i.e., X). I was wrong, as you say ...

No, you're right, I was wrong, as Andrew pointed out.

	# r

-- 
Ronan Klyne
Business Collaborator Developer
Tel: +44 01189 028518
ronan.klyne@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.groupbc.com