[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 2008-10-21 15:42 +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
G. Ken Holman wrote:At 2008-10-21 14:50 +0200, Florent Georges wrote:"G. Ken Holman" wrote: Yes, that's the CSS definition, but the XSL modification to that definition specifically make reference to the writing-direction-dependent properties because in a tb-rl writing mode the "horizontal" and "vertical" of CSS are flipped. It seems to be a lazy mans charter. Type as much as you need to get what you want. True, both properties let you set both components of separation, but the CSS shorthand is also re-interpreted in terms of XSL-FO rather than the biased terms of CSS. And as with many properties with compound components, not explicitly setting any compound component in the longhand form sets all compound components per the specification. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on courses: Wellington, NZ 2009-01 Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video sample lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg Video course overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
|

Cart



