Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote:
In one place the "." slipped into the code instead of "$Arg", and the template operated on the original text node instead of the partly processed one. Very interesting point you make there, Michael. I always found it a miss of the specification that functions cannot act on the current node (yet I did see that it would have some non-trivial complications in terms of scope and manageability). From this point of view the motivation of that decision is much clearer. Cheers, -- Abel --
|
