Subject: Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:02:17 +0100
|
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Scott> Pointing to non-standard extension functions and possibly
Scott> insecure (or locked) protocols to do what, admittedly, seem
Scott> like hacks in XSLT isn't a real substitute for a
Scott> well-designed (perhaps even standardized) XML language
Scott> designed specifically to deal with the day-to-day
Scott> requirements of an average webserver.
There are no languages designed to do these things - only languages
with library routines.
So you are right that it's not a substitute - it's the same thing.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
|