On 5/6/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...but that contradicts what you've said above

Please don't take my words literally. I was discussing possible options.

> Indeed, I'm not proposing any changes, it's no big deal - just
> pointing out (or perhaps looking for confirmation) that the xml schema
> namespace could easily have been excluded by default.

I think, pros and cons of this weigh equally. To my opinion, this
cannot be classified as a bug in the spec. I also think, cost of
providing this enhancement are quite high than the benefits.


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi