Subject: Re: XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets..
From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:39:58 +0100
|
On 22/04/2008, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dan Acuff wrote:
>
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
> >
> >
>
> Unless there's a compelling reason to do so, it is generally best to stick
> to one of the Unicode encodings, UTF-8 for example, it will save you a lot
> of encoding problems later.
US-ASCII is the encoding of choice when you are having problems - all
processes downstream will handle single byte ascii but quite often
struggle with multi-byte UTF-8. As long as the content is re-parsed
before a human gets to see it then US-ASCII should probably be the
default.
b is the clue that somewhere in the pipe isn't talking utf-8...
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000 <=
Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000
|
|
Cart
