[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 2007-11-04 19:08 +0530, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
This solution is nice. But if the OP wants to do something else with the result (not just printing the result (sequence), as this solution demonstrates), then I think xsl:for-each loop will be necessary. Excellent point, Mukul. Thank you. Then, my original post stands ... in that solution there is a loop, but whereas you looped over all car manufacturers and you do a check in side the loop every time, this will only loop for those that have the maximum number of cars. <xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:for-each select="/Sample/*[count(Car)=max(/Sample/*/count(Car))]">
<xsl:value-of select="name(.)"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>And I'm assuming that since the expression "max(/Sample/*/count(Car))" is based on an absolute XPath address, there is an opportunity for processor optimization because the value will never change for the entire execution of the stylesheet. . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Comprehensive in-depth XSLT2/XSL-FO1.1 classes: Austin TX,Jan-2008 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
|

Cart



