Hi David,

Look, I am a newbie in Docbook XSL, there are many
things that I don't understand. We have transformed
all the documentation from LATEX to XML, and now I am
trying to figure out how to solve many
formatting/compilation problems. 

So if you see some incorrect terminology I use, pardon
me. :-)

Best regards,
Nancy

--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > So how do you explain the fact that those macros
> are
> > parsed properly by the XSLTPROC according to the
> >  unless the macro contains the
> > mentioned problematic items?
> 
> They are not really macros, just normal XML
> elements, which are being
> transformed by XSLT (which you can view as a kind of
> macro expansion,
> although that's not really how it works)  But your
> "problematic" cases
> have < in attribute values so are not XML. As
> Wendell just said, if you
> modelled your data using XML elements and attributes
> rather than using
> non XML syntax, it would be easy to adjust the XSLT
> templates to your
> new format. 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company
> registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The
> registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR,
> United Kingdom.
> 
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by
> Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs. 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com