RE: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: RE: Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:05:41 +0100

> so these compound symbols appear as <cast as>

In the mail I sent, those angle brackets were chevrons. Sad that we're still
using software which only supports 7-bit characters in this day and age.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use? Dimitre Novatchev - 13 Jul 2007 04:12:30 -0000 Michael Kay - 13 Jul 2007 08:46:52 -0000 Michael Kay - 13 Jul 2007 09:06:02 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - 13 Jul 2007 13:40:44 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: Clientside XSLT Transform, David Carlisle	Date	> replaced by ">", < is, Jethro Borsje
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >