[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
For sorting, I feel you need to modify Andrew's stylesheet as following:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"> <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" /> <xsl:template match="root">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*" />
<xsl:apply-templates select="set">
<xsl:sort select="@id" data-type="number" />
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template><xsl:template match="set">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*" />
<xsl:apply-templates select="point">
<xsl:sort select="@x" data-type="number" />
<xsl:sort select="@y1" data-type="number" />
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template><xsl:template match="point">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*" />
<xsl:attribute name="y2">
<xsl:value-of select="sum(preceding-sibling::point[@x =
current()/@x]/@y1 | @y1)" />
</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet> Although this appears to be the right approach to me (for sorting), I feel this won't work, because preceding-sibling:: axis reads nodes in reverse document order (which is static), and does not read nodes from the sorted sequence (which is what I think you want). On 2/4/07, Simon Shutter <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I think I may go with 'conventional' solution provided by Andrew, because it is natively supported by .Net 2 and my data sets are relatively small and tranformed pretty quickly. I will look more into FXSL for the longer term. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
|

Cart



