Wendell Piez wrote:

> >   (//Value)[1]

> I've started teaching /descendant::Value[1] as a more intuitive and 
> transparent solution to this little (but consequential) conundrum.

> It's also reassuring to newcomers who want a simple thing to be 
> simple

  What you gain somewhere, you loose it elsewhere.  For example in the
simple "definition" of "//" (something like "it is identical to
descendant::").

  I think that to know the language, you have to know such subtleties. 
But of course, at the biginning, using a less error-prone alternative
is best.  And I think the abbreviate syntax is more intuitive and
readable to the non-used eye.

  Regards,

--drkm






















	
 p4.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Aug 14 16:13:39 GMT 2006 
	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! 
Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com