Subject: Re: What is a better word for "de-duplication"?
From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:40:04 +0100
|
I like key delegation too. But I had to think about it for a second time
before I realised how appropriate it is (I started thinking about elections,
and the difference betweena delegate and a representative).
I also like duplicate elimination.
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What is a better word for "de-duplication"?
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:13:45 -0400
I like "key delegation" but most people hearing it for the first time won't
have a clue. A good technical term is self-explanatory (at least used in
the proper context).
Key delegation might be a very nice way of describing it for advanced
thinkers, even if not all de-duplication is key delegation. (Are you always
delegating keys when one deduplicates a list?)
Cheers,
Wendell
p.s. it's fun to come to this debate late.
At 10:13 PM 8/27/2006, MDP wrote:
extended: where a 'key delegate' would represent a single instance of
multiple occurence.
M. David Peterson wrote:
keyed delegation
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb
| Current Thread |
|
Jim Melton - 28 Aug 2006 02:56:54 -0000
Steve - 28 Aug 2006 02:24:46 -0000
Michael Kay - 28 Aug 2006 08:23:49 -0000
|
|