[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Charles,
Thank you, that gets me very close, except... When I transformed the xml using the style sheet you provided, I got this: <table>
<tr><td>1</td></tr>
<tr><td>2</td></tr>
<tr><td>7</td></tr>
<tr><td>8</td></tr>
</table> <table>
<tr><td>3</td></tr>
<tr><td>4</td></tr>
<tr><td>5</td></tr>
<tr><td>6</td></tr>
</table>The problem is that the two simple groups that came after the complex group (lines 7 and 8) need to be in their own table after the complex group, like this: <table>
<tr><td>1</td></tr>
<tr><td>2</td></tr>
</table> <table>
<tr><td>3</td></tr>
<tr><td>4</td></tr>
<tr><td>5</td></tr>
<tr><td>6</td></tr>
</table> <table>
<tr><td>7</td></tr>
<tr><td>8</td></tr>
</table>Sam On 8/22/06, cknell@xxxxxxxxxx <cknell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Taking the liberty of assuming a document root named "root-element" (just substitute whatever is the case in your document), this will do what you asked. "Look Ma! No recursion!" (Pardon an American old enough to remember 1950's TV ads.)
|

Cart



