[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 6/8/06, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
but if you find yourself doing this: As I also pointed in another similar thread yesterday. distinct-values() can sometimes be confusing (AFAIR there is atomization involved, and, of course, context is lost). To summarize: the result of distinct-values() is that you get an unordered! bunch of scalar values. Context is lost. Any order is lost. You have to either: manually maintain context and re-establish order, or better, use xsl:for-each-group -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
|

Cart



