Re: [xsl] XPath question

Subject: Re: XPath question
From: "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:55:03 +0100

On 6/7/06, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Chris,

Doesn't your problem reduce to the first c node descendant?

/descendant::c[1]

?

With XSLT 1.0's first item semantics, couldn't you reduce that to:

/descendant::c

(not that that is a good a idea...)

Current Thread
XPath question Chris Robinson - 7 Jun 2006 11:10:26 -0000 Michael Kay - 7 Jun 2006 11:13:37 -0000 Chris Robinson - 7 Jun 2006 12:11:28 -0000 Wendell Piez - 7 Jun 2006 15:44:49 -0000 andrew welch - 7 Jun 2006 15:55:17 -0000 <= Message not available Wendell Piez - 7 Jun 2006 16:13:48 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XPath question, Wendell Piez	Thread	Re: XPath question, Wendell Piez
Re: XPath question, Wendell Piez	Date	Re: XPath question, Wendell Piez
	Month