-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
MrDemeanour wrote:
> Is that correct? Could it be that I've missed something obvious? The
> same construct presents no problems to Saxon.
>
Xalan-C, which I use, seems to handle comments properly. The identity
function works perfectly, processing comments as well.
I use:
Xalan version 1.8.0.
Xerces version 2.4.0.
- --
============== +----------------------------------------------+
Martin Gadbois | "Windows might take you from 0 to 60 faster, |
S/W Developer | but to go to 100 you need Unix." |
Colubris Networks Inc. +----------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFENrAg9Y3/iTTCEDkRAjzbAJ9WlmTwPqkGkkGXRcnKi+BMwuUs7QCfWVGa
uYEmsnUhAZpa5mDEFG9mEgA=
=IH/H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|