The mischief in me says to go ahead and change it,...and see who notices.  :)

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes, I'm looking into that, so that the existing stuff is unaffected and I can 
> proceed with the enhancement.
> 
> My concern is that the current output takes a lot of space - hence my only 
> copying off the very top layer for historical - so I have to see whether I can 
> output to both without taking twice the space,...I know space shouldn't be the 
> hot commodity these days, but it is at my office,...
> 
> I'm also not sure of the time impact of producing both outputs, so will have to 
> be cautious of that as well.  We run a nightlybuild that already takes longer 
> than it should, so I don't want to make it worse.
> 
> Most of the developers probably would have no problem if I completely switched 
> the results over to xml, but I think the business analysts and project managers 
> would have problems reading the output.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> Dianne
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jerry Kimmel" <jkimmel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Dianne, 
> > 
> > If it is possible to have JUnit and Emma produce XML and you do not want
> > to interfere with your existing outputs, why don't you create both HTML
> > and XML from your existing tools. That way you'll have your reports in
> > both formats.
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------
> >  Jerry Kimmel - jkimmel at vasont dot com 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:06 PM
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re:  feasibility of HTML input
> > 
> > David -
> > 
> > I was hoping not to interfere with the existing outputs,...I can go down
> > that path if this one is not worthwhile.
> > 
> > Dianne
> > 
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: David Wright <dave-xsl@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > > 
> > > I'm a bit puzzled - a quick google suggests that it isn't hard to get
> > both 
> > > JUnit and Emma to produce XML reports, as well as HTML. You'd be much 
> > > better off parsing that, than the user-friendly HTML. Is there a
> > reason 
> > > why you can't?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > David Wright