Yes. But having said that, this isn't how I would check for an empty
sequence; I would use

test="empty($value)"

Partly just personal coding style; partly a horror of the type
empty-sequence(), which gets my brain in a twist because it has so many
supertypes, and I like to think in terms of types forming a hierarchy rather
than a lattice...

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 21 March 2006 11:54
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing utility (Jeni 
> Tennison's templates)
> 
> 
> That's the thing about draft specifications; they change:-)
> 
> > instance of void()"
> 
> They changed the name of the type associated with an empty 
> sequence from
> void()
> to
> empty-sequence()
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-log-050707  (item 7)
> 
> David
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________