At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:

>>The W3C has never been the best organization for test suites and
>>interoperability. For instance they do not require even one complete
>>implementation before advancing to REC, only that each feature be
>>independently implemented. It is possible for a W3C spec to be
>>actively self-contradictory as long as different implementations
>>implement different internally consistent subsets.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:16 PM, Jim Melton wrote:

>So, your assertion has been disproven by providing a single contrary
>example.  Gratuitous criticisms are unwarranted, especially when
>untrue.

You might want to read the second paragraph of Elliotte's two-paragraph
posting before quoting his first paragraph out of context and accusing
him of making untrue, gratuitous criticism.

Bob DuCharme