Re: [xsl] Document() function: GET vs. POST

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Document() function: GET vs. POST
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:40:15 -0000

----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 11:24 AM Subject: Re: Document() function: GET vs. POST

"Joe" == Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


   Joe> Well normally you'd use a separate protocol to specify that a
   Joe> post was needed.  document("httpPost:://.....

I don't think that can be right at all.
Firstly, the word before the colon (not a double-colon as you typed),
is a URI scheme, not a protocol. The two do not map one-to-one.
Not even for http, necessarily.

Secondly, inventing new URI schemes is not a good idea as it decreases
interoperability.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Fine ,I'll start correcting every typo and instance of poor grammar that appears on this list.

What I was saying is that if you use a custom resolver you can specify a new scheme as well as override an old one. Whichever way it is done it's obviously going to decrease interoperability.

Joe

Current Thread
Re: Document() function: GET vs. POST, (continued) Colin Paul Adams - 12 Nov 2005 13:32:04 -0000 granam - 13 Nov 2005 12:03:00 -0000 Joe Fawcett - 12 Nov 2005 10:52:12 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 12 Nov 2005 11:24:29 -0000 Joe Fawcett - 12 Nov 2005 11:40:26 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Document() function: GET , Colin Paul Adams	Thread	key() returning nodes in unde, Elliot Schlegelmilch
Re: Document() function: GET , Colin Paul Adams	Date	Rearrange element in hierarch, Arulraj
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >