Subject: Re: sorted for-each: preceding::sibling is not in sort order
From: Ferdinand Soethe <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:59:09 +0100
|
Thank you all for your insights. At least now I know that didn't miss
anything.
Michael wrote:
> XSLT 2.0 allows you to use xsl:sequence
> instead of xsl:copy-of, so you can construct a variable whose value is a
> sequence of nodes (node references) without making copies of the nodes.
Wouldn't I once again have the problem with
preceding::sibling when they are references?
--
Ferdinand Soethe
|
Cart
