I just have noticed
This way of writing the code is much faster
count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='add'])
than this way:
count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and @action='add'])
Why is that?
And how do I write this piece of code like the above in the 'faster'
way?
count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and (@action='default' or
@action='add')])
Because this would imply I had two 'and' instead of one 'and' and one
'or' correct?
count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='default'][@action
='add'])
Regards
Houman
| Current Thread |
- Performance
- Khorasani, Houman - 12 Oct 2005 09:39:00 -0000 <=
|
|