Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?

Subject: Re: Strict sequential identity rule?
From: "Joris Gillis" <roac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:36:08 +0200

Tempore 15:20:04, die 09/21/2005 AD, hinc in xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>:

I'd say FALSE, because it cannot handle this XML document properly:
it can so:-)

The result of the transformation is:

<!-- foo -->
<bar>baz</bar>
<bar>baz</bar>

This is not even well-formed XML anymore. How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives this behaviour?

regards,
--
Joris Gillis (http://users.telenet.be/root-jg/me.html)
Don't send spam. I don't like it and it is illegal.

Current Thread
Strict sequential identity rule? Dimitre Novatchev - 21 Sep 2005 12:47:53 -0000 Joris Gillis - 21 Sep 2005 13:05:40 -0000 David Carlisle - 21 Sep 2005 13:26:11 -0000 Joris Gillis - 21 Sep 2005 13:36:36 -0000 <= George Cristian Bina - 21 Sep 2005 13:42:58 -0000 David Carlisle - 21 Sep 2005 14:03:29 -0000 Joris Gillis - 21 Sep 2005 14:17:38 -0000 Michael Kay - 21 Sep 2005 13:58:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Strict sequential identit, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: Strict sequential identit, George Cristian Bina
Re: Strict sequential identit, David Carlisle	Date	Re: Strict sequential identit, George Cristian Bina
	Month