Subject: Re: Strict sequential identity rule?
From: Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:06:46 -0700
|
Hi Dimitre,
Can you at least confirm that you intended to put a "/" in the match
pattern? I'm tempted to spend a long time on this if I know there's
still a riddle to be solved. :-)
Thanks,
Evan
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
Hi,
I think that trying to answer the following question can be interesting and
useful for the members of our community.
Is the following statement true or false:
"The transformation below is an identity transformation":
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="@* | node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()[1]"/>
</xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="following-sibling::node()[1]"/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Getting caught is the mother of invention.
|
Cart
