Subject: RE: Schema aware transformations
From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
|
--- Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes. A basic processor differs from a schema-aware
> processor only in that it
> rejects certain things that an SA processor accepts.
> If you're within the
> subset that a basic processor can handle, then the
> two give the same
> results.
I'll have a smile on this remark :)
>
> I think the other important thing for many people
> will be the ability to
> store a pre-compiled schema persistently. For that,
> you'll have to watch
> this space a little longer.
Hi Mike, Are you proposing this as a new feature in
XSLT 2.0 .. It looks good to me ..
Regards,
Mukul
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|