Subject: Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:38:22 +1000
|
On 13 May 2005 05:36:24 +0100, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Dimitre> Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise
> Dimitre> following the fact that the value of
>
> Dimitre> my:f($x) is my:f($x)
>
> Dimitre> is generally not guaranteed to be true()
>
> It isn't, as if either function returns an atomic sequence, you get a
> type error.
Sure, I must have added that my:f() is of type node()*.
Cheers,
Dimitre
|
Cart
