[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 May 2005 10:56:48 +0100
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Dimitre> I was talking not about "functions" but about
    Dimitre> xsl:function

    Dimitre> Does it make a difference now?

I don't see it.
You originally said:

"xsl:function -s with side effects should not have been allowed -- in
the first place."

But that is not sufficient to guarentee that f($x) is f($x) always
returns true().

So have I missed a connection in the thread somewhere?
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member