[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Jon,
At 01:18 PM 4/13/2005, you wrote: I don't really have time to whip up a test case, but shouldn't J->S, G->X, and e->x work..ie Frxshman Sophomorx Sunior Sxnior Xraduatx That looks right to me. (My plea is having had to teach this afternoon -- XSLT! :-) Of course, for a more flexible sort I would try Jirka's suggestion. Yes -- I hope the OP saw that. It's the canonical "correct" answer, I believe, if you want something general and extensible. Hopefulliy I'm not missing something obvious As always (I mean hopefully as always, not missing something obvious as always :-). Cheers, Wendell
|

Cart



