Pawson, David wrote:

> 
>
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: James Fuller 
>    performing a GET on top level URL 
>    http://www.example.org/app/tables returns
>    
>    <tables>
>    <user xmlns="http://www.example.org/app/tables/user"/>
>    <company xmlns="http://www.example.org/app/tables/company"/>
>    <products xmlns="http://www.example.org/app/tables/products"/>
>    </tables>
>    
>    note, I have bastardized REST by eschewing with xlink:href 
>    (was just transforming them into other things in any event) 
>    and defining namespaces.
>
>Why mess with dereferencing namespaces Jim? Why not use your own syntax?
><company lnk="http://www.example.org/app/tables/company"/>
>
>Works just as well, and doesn't upset TAG people!
>  
>
hehe, actually got tired of transforming xlink:href...and said to myself
well here is an empty spot...

>    so I now find myself doing things like defining namespaces 
>    for use in XSLT (though we dont have to explicitly define 
>    them, necc);
>
>
>    then with the various fn:namespace functions e.g.
>    fn:namespace-uri,fn:namespace-uri-for-prefix,fn:namespace-ur
>    i-from-QName
>    I can now infer access these resources with document() calls.
>
>
>Is this the reason for using namespaces?
>(or should that be misusing?)
>
>
>    
>    <xsl:variable name="company" 
>    select="document(fn:namespace-uri(.))"/>
>    
>
>    With every document() call I recieve xml with relevent 
>    namespaces which point to their REST implementation...it 
>    feels very state like to me, being passed a namespace which 
>    contains its REST URI implementation....would like to hear 
>    if anyone else is using XML namespace to their own ends ?
>
>No, but I'd not thought of using namespaces simply to make use
>of XSLT 2.0 functionality :-)
>  
>
hehe, its XPATH functionality which makes it a bit more generic

>Does using a @lnk make you feel any better about it?
>  
>
i have done this with xlink:href for a year and half now, all I did was
transform xlink:href......never used any xlink engine etc....never will...

>Doesn't seem very stateful to me Jim, whichever syntax is used?
>  
>
well with every document() call I am guarenteed to have a few namespaces
which point to their resource, including the one for the resource
itself, so for every HTTP GET I get  resource location  for free, not to
mention that with new xml I could get another set of namespaces that all
point to their implementations.

I wont make an arguement for such a bastard child...but it does save a
few cycles and its usage within XSLT is pretty elegant.

ta, Jim Fuller