Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:54:19 +0200

David Carlisle wrote:

Even if it had
been a faithful implementation of that draft, releasing an implementation
of a draft spec in a full non-beta release of a piece of software
distributed to 90% of the world's desktops was a mistake

Are you talking about XSLT 2.0 ? :)

Microsoft learnt that the hard way and that's the reason both XSLT 2 and XQuery are out. SQL Server will support some minimal "stable" part of XQuery and that's it. Moreover, as many microsofties say nowadays, they don't see much requests for client side declarative XML processing tools...

--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

Current Thread

Re: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default, (continued)
- Michael Kay - 8 Mar 2005 21:00:31 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Is there a reason for not, M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: Is there a reason for not, M. David Peterson
Count a substring of an attri, Ragulf Pickaxe	Date	Re: Count a substring of an a, David Carlisle
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >